Matched on outbound. Alone on inbound.

Entry prices are list prices and exclude annual discounts, seat minimums and add-ons. Where a capability sits behind a higher tier, the gating plan is named in the cell rather than shown as included.

HeyReach

Three details their pricing page does not put in large type, all taken from their own documentation.

The plan named Unlimited is capped at a 300-seat shared pool, so unlimited means no per-seat charge rather than no ceiling.

The Agency and Unlimited plans require you to bring your own proxies, unlike the entry plan, which adds roughly $5–15 per account per month, or $125–375 on top of Micro Agency.

And HeyReach is registered in Estonia, so EU and UK buyers without a valid VAT number pay VAT on top of every figure above.

Allbound360

Connection request ranges depend on whether the connected account is free or Premium, with Premium accounts sitting at the top of each range.

Annual billing takes 20% off, which works out to roughly $79, $159 and $479.

Usage resets monthly, except on Scale, which carries up to 20% of an unused allowance.

At real team sizes

Read that table honestly.

On outreach alone, Allbound360 only wins in a narrow band around three accounts.

The comparison that favours us is against a stack rather than a single product.

At three LinkedIn accounts the stack costs $147 a month across three vendors, three logins and three separate ICP setups.

Allbound360 Starter is $99

Even the conservative version of that comparison, swapping Taplio for AuthoredUp at $19.95 and dropping avatar video entirely, lands at $127.95 against $99.

AuthoredUp does post styling that we do not, so if that matters to you, our free LinkedIn text formatter covers the same ground.

Divide our allowances by the accounts they cover and the answer is the same at every tier: 400–800 connection requests per account per month, which is LinkedIn's ceiling rather than ours.

LinkedIn tolerates roughly 50–100 actions per day per account.

Allbound360 defaults to a conservative 20 connection requests and 50 messages per day per account, and every connected account has its own limits control, so a warmed-up profile and a two-week-old one do not have to run at the same speed.

HeyReach sets limits at campaign level instead, and one G2 reviewer asks specifically for more flexible daily and weekly controls.

Neither vendor caps your sending.

The difference is that we publish the resulting monthly numbers and HeyReach does not.

Across 2023 to 2026 on HeyReach, from one sender: 10,201 connection requests, 5,310 accepted at 52.1%, 2,511 messages and 788 replies at 31.4%, over 18 campaigns.

Sorting those campaigns by how warm the audience was produces the clearest number on this page.

I proved that on HeyReach, before Allbound360 existed, which is why it is not an argument that HeyReach is bad at outreach.

It is an argument that HeyReach only sells you the second half of the job.

That is a scope decision on their part rather than a defect, and it means you will buy the first half somewhere else.

For contrast, 30 days on Allbound360: 387 connection requests, 188 accepted at 48.6%, 183 messages, 41 replies at 22.4%, 92 InMails, 10 InMail replies at 10.9%, and 55 interested leads flagged.

Thirty days is not three years and I am not presenting it as equivalent evidence.

One number is worth pulling out though, which is 92 InMails in 30 days on Allbound360 against zero InMails in three years on HeyReach.

62 five-star, 5 four-star, 2 two-star, 2 one-star, and around 30 reviewers answered the "what do you dislike" prompt with some version of nothing.

This is a well-liked product with a thin tail of unhappy users, and any comparison page that tells you otherwise is selling you something.

The recurring complaints, ranked by how many separate reviewers raised them:

1. Bugs and stability, around 7 mentions. Satisfied users frame it as growing pains and the four unhappy ones treat it as disqualifying. One reports messages sent from the wrong account. My own dashboard shows one campaign in 18 with a failed status.
2. Analytics depth, 4 mentions. Thin reporting, weak sender-level analytics, no good downloadable report, and one reviewer describing the analytics as laggy and occasionally inaccurate.
3. Support latency, 4 mentions. A two-day average response time comes up specifically. This one is polarising rather than uniformly bad, since support is also the single most-praised attribute across the five-star reviews.
4. Account disconnections, 3 mentions. Being logged out every day or two, losing a message mid-send, profiles needing periodic reconnection.
5. No email in the tool, 3 mentions. Reviewers explicitly want outbound email in the sequence.
6. Campaigns not starting on time, 2 mentions. Days of delay before sends begin.

Two specifics map onto choices we made differently.

One reviewer notes that blocklisted lists cannot simply be excluded, since HeyReach has to act on those profiles before they are properly blacklisted, whereas Allbound360 imports an exclusion CSV directly.

And the disconnection complaints are why we support only credentials plus 2FA rather than three login methods.

HeyReach's browser extension is more flexible, and some users will prefer not handing over credentials at all, but the extension is the option associated with interruptions.

We picked the sturdier route over the wider menu.

Two complaints have already been fixed.

Reviewers asked for workspaces and native HubSpot, and both now ship.

HeyReach moves quickly, and pretending otherwise would make everything else here less believable.

Two caveats on all of the above.

Some complaints trace to LinkedIn's restrictions rather than HeyReach's design, and two reviewers say so themselves.

And with 71 reviews in total, four negative ones move the average a long way in either direction.

Start with the honest part, because it changes how you should read every safety claim in this category, including ours.

LinkedIn's official partner API cannot send connection requests or direct messages.

Every tool that automates LinkedIn outreach, Allbound360 and HeyReach included, operates outside that API and inside LinkedIn's tolerance rather than its permission.

Any vendor telling you their architecture makes them immune is selling you something.

On 25 March 2026, LinkedIn removed HeyReach's company page, which had around 16,400 followers, along with several executives' personal profiles.

HeyReach confirmed it on their own blog, said customer automations were unaffected, and noted that LinkedIn has taken similar action against Apollo, Seamless, Evaboot, Lemlist and La Growth Machine.

Four controls, and where each tool sits

The proxy line is the one to look at

A proxy is the network address your automation appears to come from.

Shared or low-quality addresses are one of the clearer signals LinkedIn uses to identify automated activity, which is why every serious tool assigns one per account.

HeyReach includes a dedicated residential proxy on its entry plan, then stops.

Their Agency plan at $999 and Unlimited at $2,999 both require customers to bring their own.

That inverts the risk in an uncomfortable way: the buyers running the most LinkedIn accounts, and therefore carrying the most exposure, are the ones whose network infrastructure their vendor no longer supplies or controls.

Proxy quality then varies by whatever that customer happened to buy, at roughly $5 to $15 per account per month on top of the subscription.

Allbound360 includes a dedicated residential proxy on every plan, from $99 through Agency.

There is no tier at which we hand that responsibility back to you.

Per-account limits, and why campaign-level is not the same thing

A LinkedIn account that has been running for three years and one connected last Tuesday should not send at the same rate.

Campaign-level limits cannot express that difference, because the campaign spans both accounts.

Per-account limits can.

Allbound360 puts a limits control on each connected account, so you can hold a new profile at a fraction of the volume while a mature one runs at full speed inside the same campaign.

This is not a theoretical distinction: one HeyReach reviewer on G2 asks specifically for more flexible daily and weekly limit controls, and three more report account disconnections and profiles needing periodic reconnection.

What you still have to do yourself

No tool enforces good judgement, and neither of these does.

Warm new accounts over weeks rather than days, keep messages personalised enough that recipients do not report them, avoid stacking two tools on the same account on the same day when you are migrating, and treat your LinkedIn profiles as assets rather than disposable.

Both products support that discipline.

Neither will stop you ignoring it.

And if vendor-level platform risk is genuinely disqualifying for you, the honest answer is that you should not buy either product.

Leaving HeyReach, every lead list exports to CSV from a one-click row menu, and the API is on every plan, though done-for-you migration only comes with the $2,999 plan.

Leaving Allbound360, contacts and campaign data export, while posts and voice settings do not travel.

In either direction, campaign sequences get rebuilt rather than transferred, historical analytics stay behind, and exclusion lists need re-uploading, which Allbound360 accepts as a direct CSV import.

We are the newer product here, so low switching cost is the argument that helps us.

I would rather tell you switching is easy than pretend you are locked in.

If you are moving across, keep both tools running for the first week and pause sending in the old one before you launch the same account here, because stacking two tools on one account doubles your real activity.